Login or register
Letters to the editor for Nov. 3, 2009
Opportunities abound to help homeless


Posted: Monday, November 02, 2009
- 11/3/09
2
Story Tools
Font Size:
Letters to the editor for Nov. 3, 2009 Facebook
Get FREE Daily Headlines by email!

advertisement
A big thank you to the owner of Pete's Pets for making his building available for the Interfaith Overflow Shelter this winter! Thanks also to Holy Faith Episcopal and First Presbyterian churches for providing space until it's ready, and to The New Mexican for your coverage of the shelter's needs. Faith communities of all backgrounds are encouraged to take a week this winter to help with both food and volunteers.

People who aren't part of a faith community can gather a group of friends to help out. Even kids can help by making food. Caring for the homeless and the hungry is the mark of an ethical human being, regardless of age, class, or religious belief. And along with the Interfaith Shelter, please keep in mind the year-round needs of St. Elizabeth Shelter, the Youth Shelter, and La Luz.

The Rev. Talitha Arnold

The United Church of Santa Fe

Diminished career

The recent uproar about the health violations at the Tesuque Village Market makes me wonder how many of those writers are familiar with working in kitchens in Santa Fe. I was first a short-order cook when I was 16 and living in Connecticut, and had been off-and-on throughout my adult life.

While not low-skilled, it is low-paying and a fairly thankless job, and those who do it, do it for the love of cooking. I worked my last cooking job about eight years ago, as cheap immigrant labor took over most cooking positions in Santa Fe. The immigrants did not take the jobs that Americans no longer wanted; the Americans no longer wanted the jobs as the immigrants/owners were lowering the rates of pay/overtime, etc.

Just because someone can put out a plate of food for less money than someone else does not make them a conscientious cook. I've witnessed an overall ignorance and lack of concern for sanitation, proper food handling and temperatures and so forth, to the point where the profession no longer held any satisfaction for me.

Dale Lotreck

Pecos

Climate change rally

I was extremely disappointed that The New Mexican did not cover the International Day of Climate Action event here in Santa Fe on Oct. 24, where more than 500 people of all ages attended to urge our local, state, and national governments to push for a strong, effective climate treaty in Copenhagen in December.

Despite recent oil and gas company-funded advertisements to the contrary, scientists around the world now agree that we must act quickly to reduce our fossil fuel emissions in order to maintain a climate on Earth that will sustain human and other life into the future. The millions of people around the world who were involved in the events on Oct. 24 showed that the human community agrees that we need strong action now.

For more information on these events and the science behind them, please visit 350.org. For more information on the Copenhagen Climate Change Conference, please see http://en.cop15.dk.

Heather Karlson

Santa Fe

Greedy tricksters

This was my family's first Halloween in Santa Fe, and it was terribly disappointing. Wanting to take my children trick-or-treating with friends, I put out a nice large bowl of Kit-Kats and Reese's for kids along with a sign: "Please take one so there is enough for everybody," on my front porch.

No less than five minutes later, the bowl was empty, and a 9-year old boy was carrying a Wal-Mart bag containing the entire bowl's contents — with his mother following him down the street!

I asked them if they took it, and they shot me a blank stare as if they didn't understand what I was saying. So sad. After years of leaving candy out in good faith in other communities in which I have resided, I can no longer continue the practice, at least not in Santa Fe.

Ryan S. Flahive

Santa Fe

Older than 400

Let's at least be honest about the "400th Anniversary" celebration being funded with our tax dollars. The community currently known as Santa Fe is much older than 400 years. The shift that occurred 400 years ago was the arrival of the Spanish, an event that some of us don't want to celebrate. A real Santa Fe history event, that elucidates all of the shifts and swings of human occupation of this location would be of infinitely more value. Let's fund real education, not bigotry.

Sandy Lynch

Santa Fe


You must login to make comments.
Click on the link below to register for a free account. This is a new system and previous accounts are not transferred to this system. You'll be asked for your name and e-mail address. A confirmation e-mail with a password will be sent to you at the address you provide. Once you've logged into the system, you'll be able to view and contribute comments. Please be respectful to your fellow users and post under your own name. Send questions to webeditor@sfnewmexican.com

Email:
Password:
Remember me
Register here for a free username and password

Comments (8)
What do you think? Add your two cents to the conversation by contributing your view on the news. Please, be respectful to the community and your fellow users and use your real name when posting. Inappropriate postings will be removed and your privileges to comment further might be suspended. If you'd prefer to submit a letter to the editor for possible inclusion in The New Mexican's print edition, visit our submissions page.


(not you? logout)

peter ogden   (posted on 11/6/2009)
I guess this explains why there is so little world class beautiful architecture in SFe. Mud.mud...mud...muddy Medieval Mongolia: primordial design.
Steve van Dresser   (posted on 11/4/2009)
Charlie, proof of an impact does not require precise measurements. If you are run over by a car and killed, does it really matter exactly how much the car weighed, how fast it was going, what its impulse force was on your body?
Roy Striet   (posted on 11/4/2009)
Heather: The "recent oil and gas company-funded advertisements" are just the latest in a mega-multi-million $$$ effort by carbon based industries to simply create confusion about the scientific facts. Astro-turf efforts, compliant corporate media, U.S. Global Change Research Program notes "a recent assessment of climate change consequences in the United States from 13 federal science agencies found that global warming from higher levels of carbon dioxide is "already affecting water, energy, transportation, agriculture, ecosystems, and health." The report notes that dramatically reducing heat-trapping emissions will help us avoid the worst consequences of climate change. These findings are consistent with research from the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change as well as statements from the National Academy of Sciences and the world's most prominent scientific societies." http://www.globalchange.gov/publications/reports/scientific-assessments/us-impacts/key-findings As the Union of Concerned Scientists says: "Climate change is hazardous to your health and so are the disinformation campaigns from oil and coal companies."
Charlie Crane   (posted on 11/4/2009)
Ms. Karlson: Since you say Global Warming and Climate Change are "measurable, real and can be proven" ... please tell us exactly how much human activity is affecting each of them, how much is caused by solar activity and how much is natural.
Heather Karlson   (posted on 11/3/2009)
for John Ewing: Both global warming and climate change are measurable, real, and can be proven. Global warming is part of climate change; climate change is the broader term. Here is a definition from http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/climate_by_any_other_name.html: "Global warming refers to surface temperature increases, while climate change includes global warming and everything else that increasing greenhouse gas amounts will affect." ... "temperature change itself isn't the most severe effect of changing climate. Changes to precipitation patterns and sea level are likely to have much greater human impact than the higher temperatures alone. For this reason, scientific research on climate change encompasses far more than surface temperature change. So 'global climate change' is the more scientifically accurate term."
John Ewing   (posted on 11/3/2009)
Heather Karlson, I noticed you and many other only use the term "climate change" instead of the old "global WARMING". Why? Could it be because "global warming" can be measured, proved or disproved, and the more arbitrary "climate change" is simply in the eye of the beholder?
PC Chavez   (posted on 11/3/2009)
You go Dale Lotreck. These are tax-cheating, law-breaking, owners trying to cut corners at the cost of our health. With today's problems of flu and swine flu, the health department should really be strict on restaurants. Not only in the kitchen area, but also the restrooms. Toilet seat liners should be law.
RandyNason   (posted on 11/3/2009)
With regard to Sandy Lynch, Older than 400: A lot of celebration has been cut back, due to the current financial crunch. It goes without saying that the Santa Fe community is older than 400 years, although it is a fact that Santa Fe is the longest standing capital city in the U.S. and that's saying something.


advertisement
  • JB Yelsky commented on
  • Ambro A commented on
  • P Orlando Baca commented on
  • Truett Collins commented on
  • Ambro A commented on
  • Joe McNabb commented on
  • Ambro A commented on
  • Doreen Saiz-Adler commented on